State v. Marintorres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• demonstrating how pro se briefs are held to the same standard as those written by counsel
• refusing to consider arguments raised in pro se supplemental brief because “brief is conclusory and does not identify any specific legal issues or cite any authority”
• declining to consider arguments where pro se brief did not comply with RAP
• conclusory pro se supplemental brief that identified no specific legal issues not considered
• conclusory pro se supplemental brief that identified no specific legal issues not considered
• appellate court need not consider pro se arguments that are conclusory or unsupported

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).