Skip to main content
· 1/19/1978

Haller v. Wallis

Citations

  • 573 P.2d 1302
  • 89 Wash. 2d 539
  • 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of motion under CR 60(b)(1) to vacate an \Amended Order Authorizing Settlement\
  • “a ruling which sets aside a default will be reviewed more leniently than one which denies a trial on the merits”
  • absent a showing of fraud or collusion, a client is bound by his/her attorney's settlement of his/her claims even though such settlement is contrary to the client's instructions
  • Attorney notified client of hearing and attended hearing on client’s behalf, unaware of client’s desire to terminate attorney’s representation. The court held that the actions of the attorney were binding on the client.
  • “[T]he law favors amicable settlement of disputes . . . .”
  • \[T]he law favors amicable settlement of disputes. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosellini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.