Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quotingHearst Corp. v. Hoppe, 90 Wn.2d 123, 127, 580 P.2d 246 (1978)
• referring to penalty for each day the \records\ were wrongfully withheld
• referring to penalty for each day the “records” were wrongfully withheld
• “Any materials that would not be discoverable in the context of a controversy under the civil rules of pretrial discovery are also exempt from public disclosure under [the PRA].”
• \good faith reliance on an exemption does not preclude imposition of [PRA] penalties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).