Skip to main content

State v. Mason

Citations

  • 170 Wash. App. 375
  • 285 P.3d 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • charging document is constitutionally sufficient if the information states each essential element of the erime, even if it is vague as to some other matter significant to the defense
  • declining to consider passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument
  • eourts first look to the statute to determine the elements that the prosecution must prove to sustain a conviction
  • “We do not consider conclusory arguments unsupported by citation to authority.”
  • “We do not consider conclusory arguments unsupported by citation to authority.”
  • declining to consider insufficiently briefed contention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Deren, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.