Holland v. City of Tacoma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that “[p]assing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration.”
• noting that “[p]assing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument” does not merit our consideration
• noting that “[p]assing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument” does not merit our consideration
• \Passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration.\
• \Passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration.\
• \Passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).