Oregon Supreme Court· 11/6/1979

State v. Haynes

Citations

602 P.2d 272
288 Or. 59
1979 Ore. LEXIS 1211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing Article I, section 12, right to counsel as a “derivative right” to protect against involuntary confessions
describing Article I, section 12, right to counsel as a “derivative right” to protect against involuntary confessions
describing Article I, section 12, right to counsel as a “derivative right” to protect against involuntary confessions
identifying, in a related context, the information necessary for a knowing waiver of the Article I, section 12 right to counsel
identifying information that, under certain circumstances, police categorically must provide to permit a determination that the defendant “knowingly and intelli- gently” waived Article I, section 12, right to counsel
requiring evidence that the defendant was aware not only of the right to counsel generally but also of the benefit of counsel’s assistance in “forestalling] involuntary and incriminating disclosures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linde, Denecke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.