Michael v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different
• Court must weigh cumulative impact of statements to determine if there was plain error
• “Evidence which the defense can use to impeach a prosecution witness . . . as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within the Brady rule.” (citation omitted)
• “Evidence which the defense can use to impeach a prosecution witness . . . as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within the Brady rule.” (citation omitted)
• court should review prosecutor’s rebuttal in light of defense’s closing argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).