New York Court of Appeals· 5/4/1976

People v. Hobson

Citations

39 N.Y.2d 479
348 N.E.2d 894
384 N.Y.S.2d 419
1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding constitutional prohibition against use of statements taken without notice to defense counsel, buttressing suppression and reversal with discussion of DR 7-104(A)(1) violation
discussing right to counsel rule “grounded in this State's constitutional and statutory guarantees”
civil case; exclusion of evidence is not proper remedy for a violation of DR 7-104(A)(1) absent infringement of constitutional rights
once attorney enters proceeding, police may not question defendant in absence of counsel without affirmative waiver of right to counsel, made in presence of an attorney
“once counsel enters the proceedings”, state constitution permits waiver only in the presence of counsel.
civil case; exclusion of evidence is not proper remedy for a violation of DR 7-104(A)(l) absent infringement of constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitel, Gabrielli, Jasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

397 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Hobson

35 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.