Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/14/2006
Watson v. State
Citations
- 634 S.E.2d 642
- 370 S.C. 68
- 2006 S.C. LEXIS 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing when counsel provides a valid trial strategy in response to a Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim, counsel’s performance will not be deemed deficient
- recognizing when counsel provides a valid trial strategy in response to a Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim, counsel's performance will not be deemed deficient
- finding trial counsel was not deficient when his failure to object to inadmissible hearsay testimony was part of a valid trial strategy
- finding counsel’s performance was not deficient in making the decision not to object to “inadmissible” testimony because his strategy—that doing so “might lead to the more damaging introduction” of other evidence—was valid
- finding counsel’s performance was not deficient in making the decision not to object to “inadmissible” testimony because his strategy—that doing so “might lead to the more damaging introduction” of other evidence—was valid
- finding trial counsel had articulated a valid strategy for not objecting to the corroborative and impermissible hearsay where counsel reasonably believed that objecting to the corroborative testimony could lead to the introduction of more damaging evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-07· cited 93×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-02-16· cited 59×
- STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
- State v. VickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-25· cited 30×
- Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-07-19· cited 24×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-03-21· cited 22×
- Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 17×
- Council v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-12-29· cited 11×
- South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles v. McCarsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-01-24· cited 11×
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-03-29· cited 9×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 7×
- Weik v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-23· cited 7×
- Vail v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-02-20· cited 3×
- State v. NanceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-11· cited 2×
- Abney v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-03-19· cited 2×
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-02-08
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 86×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 75×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 52×
- Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-27· cited 34×
- Dawkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-13· cited 33×
- State v. Cabrera-PenaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-08· cited 29×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-05· cited 29×
- Magazine v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 11×
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.