Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/13/2001
Dawkins v. State
Citations
- 551 S.E.2d 260
- 346 S.C. 151
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that testimony that improperly corroborates a child sex victim’s testimony has a devastating impact because of the cumulative effect of repeating the victim’s testimony, and thereby improperly bolstering the victim’s credibility
- finding counsel’s performance was deficient in making a decision not to object to the admission of testimony when the underlying strategy was not sound
- finding counsel's performance was deficient in making a decision not to object to the admission of testimony when the underlying strategy was not sound
- finding counsel's performance was deficient in making a decision not to object to the admission of testimony when the underlying strategy was not sound
- finding the testimony of four witnesses corroborating what the victim “told them regarding her alleged sexual abuse served only to bolster [the victim’s] credibility” and concluding such improper corroboration had a “ ‘devastating impact’ on petitioner’s trial”
- finding trial counsel's failure to object to testimony because he did not want to confuse or upset the jury was not a valid strategy because he could have sought a determination as to the inadmissibility of the testimony out of the hearing of the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 122×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-02-16· cited 59×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 47×
- STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-14· cited 25×
- Ingle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-02-19· cited 24×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-01-07· cited 24×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-03-21· cited 22×
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-17· cited 15×
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 15×
- Tappeiner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-05-04· cited 15×
- Huggler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 12×
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-03-29· cited 9×
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 7×
- Teamer v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-04-13· cited 4×
- Vail v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-02-20· cited 3×
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-02-08
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 86×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 69×
- State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-22· cited 43×
- Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-11-14· cited 31×
- Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-02-24· cited 28×
- Foye v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 27×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-13· cited 20×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 18×
- State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-04-06· cited 18×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-10-16· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.