Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/20/2013
Vail v. State
Citations
- 402 S.C. 77
- 738 S.E.2d 503
- 2013 WL 621210
- 2013 S.C. App. LEXIS 47
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where counsel articulates a strategy, it is measured under an objective standard of reasonableness.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Konduros, Lockemy, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 86×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-02-16· cited 59×
- Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
- Dawkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-13· cited 33×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-05· cited 29×
- State v. WinklerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-16· cited 29×
- Rosemond v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-29· cited 25×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-14· cited 25×
- Ingle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-02-19· cited 24×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 18×
- Roseboro v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-01-23· cited 18×
- Huggler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 12×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 12×
- State v. TennantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-08-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.