· 1/24/2011
South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles v. McCarson
Citations
- 705 S.E.2d 425
- 391 S.C. 136
- 2011 S.C. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting in a license revocation proceeding, the burden of proving that the driver was. lawfully arrested or detained for DUI was on the Department
- noting Rule 803(8), SCRE, provides for the admission of certain public records but still excludes “investigative notes involving opinions, judgments, or conclusions”
- \[T]he [O]MVH is an agency under the Administrative Procedures Act.\
- \[T]he Legislature promulgated section 56-5-2951 in such a way that guards against an automatic or rote elimination of [a person's interest in his or her driver's license] . . . . [T]he Legislature placed the burden on the Department to present sufficient evidence . . . .\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Toal, Pleicones, Hearn, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.