Ninth Circuit· 8/29/2012

Michael Lacey v. Joseph Arpaio

Citations

693 F.3d 896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that arresting someone in retaliation for the 13 exercise of free speech rights is sufficient to chill speech
holding that for claims dismissed with prejudice, a plaintiff is not required to reallege such claims in a subsequent amended complaint to preserve them for appeal
holding that for claims 13 dismissed with prejudice, a plaintiff is not required to reallege such claims in a 14 subsequent amended complaint to preserve them for appeal
holding that “economic loss does not necessarily accompany dilution, so [ ] conclusory allegations of loss are insufficient” to state a claim under the Securities Exchange Act for material misrepresentation in a proxy statement
noting that claims 25 dismissed with leave to amend which are not re-alleged in an amended pleading may be 26 “considered waived if not repled.”
noting that claims dismissed with leave 21 to amend that are not realleged in an amended pleading may be “considered waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Schroeder, Pregerson, Reinhardt, Fletcher, Fisher, Tallman, Rawlinson, Bybee, Bea, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

146 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

116 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Michael Lacey v. Joseph Arpaio

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.