Vasilevsky v. Reno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff “must do more than just deny or criticize the proffered reasons of the .defendant”
• “[Plaintiffs opinion of the relative merits of her credentials as opposed to those of selected individuals is irrelevant.”
• “An employer is entitled to rely on his own perception of an employee’s work performance.”
• “An employer is entitled to rely on his perception of an employee’s work performance.”
• “[T]he plaintiff must . . . show by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant’s non-discriminatory reasons . . . were not the true reasons, but rather a pretext for discrimination.”
• involving problems four and five years prior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).