Skip to main content
· 9/25/1986

Smith v. Chamber of Commerce of United States

Citations

  • 645 F. Supp. 604
  • 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1573
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Pjlaintiffs employers were entitled to rely on reports of plaintiffs performance given by his immediate supervisor ... and by others familiar with his work.”
  • “ ‘[flaking as true that appellant was unaware ... of the dissatisfaction with his performance, ... [is] no basis for an inference of discrimination' ”
  • “plaintiff must prove that age made a difference in the employer’s decision in the sense that ‘but for’ the discriminatory motive, the employee would have been retained”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley S. Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.