· 4/28/2004
Tolson v. James
Citations
- 315 F. Supp. 2d 110
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7337
- 2004 WL 909475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is the perception of the decisionmaker which is relevant.” (quoting Waterhouse v. Dist. of Columbia, 124 F. Supp. 2d 1, 7 (D.D.C. 2000)
- “Pre-selection does not violate Title VII unless it is based on discriminatory motives.”
- “Pre-selection does not violate Title VII unless it is based on discriminatory motives.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.