Skip to main content
· 4/28/2004

Tolson v. James

Citations

  • 315 F. Supp. 2d 110
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7337
  • 2004 WL 909475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is the perception of the decisionmaker which is relevant.” (quoting Waterhouse v. Dist. of Columbia, 124 F. Supp. 2d 1, 7 (D.D.C. 2000)
  • “Pre-selection does not violate Title VII unless it is based on discriminatory motives.”
  • “Pre-selection does not violate Title VII unless it is based on discriminatory motives.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.