Skip to main content

Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao

Citations

  • 360 F. Supp. 2d 105
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25539
  • 2004 WL 2861408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that two days less than three months “clearly pushes the temporal requirement in a retaliation case to its outer limit”
  • holding that “ethnic slurs, sexist comments, and inappropriate age statements” did not rise “to the level of creating a hostile work environment,” in part for that reason
  • describing three-month window as the “outer limit” of the temporal requirement in a retaliation case
  • describing a three-month window as the “outer limit” of the temporal requirement in retaliation cases
  • three months is the outer limit for a temporal showing of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.