District of Columbia· 3/30/2004
Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao
Citations
- 360 F. Supp. 2d 105
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25539
- 2004 WL 2861408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that two days less than three months “clearly pushes the temporal requirement in a retaliation case to its outer limit”
- holding that “ethnic slurs, sexist comments, and inappropriate age statements” did not rise “to the level of creating a hostile work environment,” in part for that reason
- describing three-month window as the “outer limit” of the temporal requirement in a retaliation case
- describing a three-month window as the “outer limit” of the temporal requirement in retaliation cases
- three months is the outer limit for a temporal showing of causation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict of Columbia· 2009-04-25· cited 164×
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-10· cited 50×
- McIntyre v. PetersDistrict of Columbia· 2006-11-06· cited 47×
- Laurent v. Bureau of Rehabilitation, Inc.District of Columbia· 2008-04-14· cited 45×
- Wada v. TomlinsonDistrict of Columbia· 2007-05-09· cited 40×
- Singleton v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2005-07-22· cited 34×
- Ramey v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia· 2006-03-31· cited 32×
- Vick v. DonahoeDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-28· cited 24×
- Medina v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-06-06· cited 22×
- ['DAVIS v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY']District of Columbia· 2014-03-20· cited 19×
- Moran v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-20· cited 18×
- McFadden v. Ballard, Spahr, Andrews, & Ingersoll, LLPDistrict of Columbia· 2008-09-30· cited 17×
- Alford v. Providence HospitalDistrict of Columbia· 2013-05-23· cited 17×
- Gonda v. DonahoeDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-11· cited 17×
- Glenn v. BairDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-10· cited 15×
- Asghar v. PaulsonDistrict of Columbia· 2008-09-24· cited 14×
- Lowe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-15· cited 14×
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo N.A.District of Columbia· 2006-10-24· cited 12×
- Khan v. GonzalesDistrict of Columbia· 2014-03-31· cited 10×
- Holmes v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-23· cited 3×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 3,700×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1992-05-21· cited 1,717×
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsNinth Circuit· 2004-01-02· cited 917×
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.D.C. Circuit· 1999-12-21· cited 670×
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayD.C. Circuit· 1993-11-26· cited 539×
- Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanySeventh Circuit· 1995-03-20· cited 505×
- Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsD.C. Circuit· 1981-01-12· cited 489×
- In re Sealed CaseD.C. Circuit· 1997-06-17· cited 467×
- Li Li Manatt v. Bank of America, NaNinth Circuit· 2003-07-28· cited 463×
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-30· cited 463×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.