Brown v. Vance-Cooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[s]ummary judgment should be granted for an employer where an employee cannot demonstrate that every proffered nonretaliatory reason for” an adverse action “was pretextual”
• finding that the plaintiff had “simply not proven that [the employer’s] reasons were pretext”
• noting that the plaintiff failed to dispute his lack of improvement during his performance improvement plan period, and concluding that his omission meant that he could not “demonstrate [the] falsity of the criticisms of his performance”
• “Summary judgment should be granted for an employer where an employee cannot demonstrate that every proffered nonretaliato-ry reason for the termination was pretex-tual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).