· 10/18/2006
Edwards v. Agency
Citations
- 456 F. Supp. 2d 72
- 18 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1333
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75317
- 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to find that a constraint on the opportunity to seek out “potentially fruitful” employment opportunities is an adverse employment action
- requiring “discernible, as opposed to a speculative, effect on the terms, conditions, or privileges of one’s employment”
- “[T]o be adverse, the denial of a travel or training opportunity must have a discernible, as opposed to a speculative, effect on the terms, conditions, or privileges of one’s employment.”
- outlining standard for effective accommodation under Rehabilitation Act
- denial of single training or travel opportunity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.