Skip to main content
· 10/18/2006

Edwards v. Agency

Citations

  • 456 F. Supp. 2d 72
  • 18 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1333
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75317
  • 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to find that a constraint on the opportunity to seek out “potentially fruitful” employment opportunities is an adverse employment action
  • requiring “discernible, as opposed to a speculative, effect on the terms, conditions, or privileges of one’s employment”
  • “[T]o be adverse, the denial of a travel or training opportunity must have a discernible, as opposed to a speculative, effect on the terms, conditions, or privileges of one’s employment.”
  • outlining standard for effective accommodation under Rehabilitation Act
  • denial of single training or travel opportunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.