Skip to main content

Cooke v. Rosenker

Citations

  • 601 F. Supp. 2d 64
  • 14 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1223
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15480
  • 2009 WL 484955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases from the First, Third, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits that held that the anti-retaliation provision of the FLSA protects informal complaints
  • “[A] six-month delay by itself is insufficient to demonstrate the close temporal proximity necessary to infer a retaliatory motivation.”
  • \[A] six-month delay by itself is insufficient to demonstrate the close temporal proximity necessary to infer a retaliatory motivation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cooke v. Rosenker

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.