Julsen v. Julsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inherited stock remained separate because it was placed in joint trading account only \as an administrative convenience\ and non-owner spouse did not participate in account management
• holding that inherited stock remained separate because it was placed in joint trading account only \as an administrative convenience\ and non-owner spouse did not participate in account management
• noting that an express tally of factors is unnecessary as long as the record reflects consideration of factors
• noting that an express tally of factors is unnecessary as long as the record reflects consideration of factors
• rejecting need for express tally of all statutory factors where record reflects careful scrutiny by superior court
• rejecting need for express tally of all statutory factors where record re- fleets careful scrutiny by superior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).