Alaska Supreme Court· 12/15/2000
Sampson v. Sampson
Citations
- 14 P.3d 272
- 2000 Alas. LEXIS 121
- 2000 WL 1839717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that whether ICWA’s notice requirement was satisfied is a question of law that we review de novo
- noting that equitable considerations have no direct bearing on whether parties intended to treat property as part of marital estate
- noting that trial court's analysis \runs together the doctrines of transmutation of separate property into marital property and invasion of separate property\
- noting that although first factor only applies to real property, other factors may apply to both real and personal property
- noting that husband's \belief and representation\ that his inheritance would be \available to [the couple] during the marriage [did] not suffice to warrant a finding that the assets were converted to marital property\
- \An equal division of the marital property is presumed to be equitable.\ (citing Nicholson v. Wolfe, 974 P.2d 417, 422 (Alaska 1999))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 81×
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-04-16· cited 68×
- Harrower v. HarrowerAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-06-13· cited 57×
- Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 54×
- Green v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-08-31· cited 29×
- Martin v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 26×
- Kessler v. KesslerAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-02-16· cited 24×
- Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-06-01· cited 20×
- Krize v. KrizeAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-08-25· cited 11×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court· 1962-02-06· cited 197×
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-05-13· cited 139×
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 105×
- Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-06-27· cited 63×
- Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-08-14· cited 56×
- Chotiner v. ChotinerAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-04-03· cited 50×
- Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-26· cited 41×
- Vanover v. VanoverAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-05-04· cited 37×
- Lundquist v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-08-16· cited 35×
- Brown v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-10-31· cited 13×
- Rhodes v. RhodesAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-02-04· cited 12×
- Ross v. RossAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-05-04· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.