Skip to main content

Sampson v. Sampson

Citations

  • 14 P.3d 272
  • 2000 Alas. LEXIS 121
  • 2000 WL 1839717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that whether ICWA’s notice requirement was satisfied is a question of law that we review de novo
  • noting that equitable considerations have no direct bearing on whether parties intended to treat property as part of marital estate
  • noting that trial court's analysis \runs together the doctrines of transmutation of separate property into marital property and invasion of separate property\
  • noting that although first factor only applies to real property, other factors may apply to both real and personal property
  • noting that husband's \belief and representation\ that his inheritance would be \available to [the couple] during the marriage [did] not suffice to warrant a finding that the assets were converted to marital property\
  • \An equal division of the marital property is presumed to be equitable.\ (citing Nicholson v. Wolfe, 974 P.2d 417, 422 (Alaska 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.