Skip to main content
· 6/29/1989

United States v. William Joseph Pandozzi

Citations

  • 878 F.2d 1526
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 477
  • 30 ERC (BNA) 1181
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9368
  • 1989 WL 70060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 608(a) bars asking a witness to evaluate another witness’s veracity
  • where government does not know which version of witness’s testimony is true, no use of false testimony
  • district court did not act beyond its lawful powers by allowing prosecution to reopen its case
  • “Brady does not require the government to turn over information which, ‘with any reasonable diligence, the defendant can obtain himself”
  • district court did not act beyond its lawful powers by allowing prosecution to reopen its case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Breyer, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.