United States v. Daniel A. White and Judith A. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there is no suppression of evidence in violation of Brady when the evidence is accessible to the defendant before trial through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• “When defendants miss the exculpatory nature of documents in their possession or to which they have access, they cannot miraculously resuscitate their defense after conviction by invoking Brady.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).