D.C. Circuit· 1/2/1980
United States v. David H. Moore
Citations
- 613 F.2d 1029
- 198 U.S. App. D.C. 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Normally, of course, ‘or’ is to be accepted for its disjunctive connotation, and not as a word interchangeable with ‘and.’” (footnote omitted)
- “Normally, of course, ‘or’ is to be accepted for its disjunctive connotation, and not as a word interchangeable with ‘and.’”
- interpreting “or” in a statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: III, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Florsheim Shoe Company, Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1984-07-12· cited 114×
- United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene MastropieriSecond Circuit· 1985-04-23· cited 97×
- State v. AndrewsAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-08-08· cited 92×
- United States v. Barnes, JohnD.C. Circuit· 2002-07-23· cited 89×
- Unification Church v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1985-06-04· cited 83×
- United States v. Alfred Scivola, Jr.First Circuit· 1985-07-02· cited 72×
- United States v. SebaggalaFirst Circuit· 2001-07-16· cited 67×
- Hightower v. Texas Hospital Ass'nFifth Circuit· 1995-09-28· cited 62×
- United States v. Paul L. BarrettD.C. Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 57×
- United States v. One 1973 Rolls RoyceThird Circuit· 1995-02-24· cited 55×
- Wilburn S. Bruce v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Conroe, Inc.First Circuit· 1988-02-17· cited 52×
- United States v. DurhamTenth Circuit· 1998-03-24· cited 50×
- Duke B. Kelly v. Wauconda Park District, a Local Governmental Agency of the State of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1986-09-12· cited 48×
- United States v. William C. ScrimgeourFifth Circuit· 1981-02-12· cited 45×
- Timothy J. Willis v. United States of America, Daryl MacNeil and Paul D. MacNeil v. United States of America, Robert J. Seufert, Jr. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1983-10-12· cited 45×
- United States v. Robert James Maker, A/K/A Robert Maker, A/K/A R.J. Mahar Constance Bridget SullivanThird Circuit· 1984-12-28· cited 45×
- United States v. Norman William SmeathersEighth Circuit· 1989-08-31· cited 43×
- United States v. ArnessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2015-08-19· cited 40×
- C. Richard Brown v. American Life Holdings, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1999-09-03· cited 39×
- United States v. William Joseph PandozziFirst Circuit· 1989-06-29· cited 37×
Cites
107 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- United States v. BassSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 1,739×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,194×
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,095×
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 992×
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 793×
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 673×
- United States v. HaldemanD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-12· cited 661×
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 657×
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-12-15· cited 631×
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 482×
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 449×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.