United States v. Richard A. Nazzaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding testimony material because it bore on the activities of the “kingfish” of the alleged conspiracy
• finding testimony material because it “had the potential of providing valuable leads as to how [the conspiracy] worked”
• newspaper story concerning corrupt police officers not presumptively prejudicial as to police officer defendant in unrelated case
• newspaper story concerning corrupt police officers not presumptively prejudicial as to police officer defendant in unrelated case
• “[T]he law wisely affords the trier ... substantial discretion in determining whether to interrogate jurors.”
• “the law wisely affords the trier — who is on the front lines, sensitive to the nuances of the case before him — substantial discretion in determining” possible prejudicial influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).