Skip to main content

Preston v. State

Citations

  • 444 Md. 67
  • 118 A.3d 902
  • 2015 Md. LEXIS 494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency.”
  • “The reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency.”
  • “The reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency.”
  • “The reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.