UNITED STATES v. RAFAEL PAGÁN-SANTINI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant charged with one count of perjury based on three separate statements had not shown plain error in court’s failure to instruct jurors that they must unanimously agree on which specific statements were perjurious
• \That [the defendant] was not allowed to wander through the FBI premises except under escort is no surprise; it is unlikely that a federal judge would fare any better.\
• “[A missing witness] instruction may be given where a party controls or has peculiar access to a witness and, in the circumstances, it may be reasonable to suppose that the party would produce the witness unless the testimony was unfavorable.”
• “[A missing witness] instruction may be given where a party controls or has peculiar access to a witness and, in the circumstances, it may be reasonable to suppose that the party would produce the witness unless the testimony was unfavorable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).