United States v. Waybright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the defendant did not have standing to assert a Tenth Amendment claim because he had “not suffered any injury as a result of Congress’ alleged commandeering of state officials.”
• “SOR-NA’s legislative history contains no express congressional findings regarding the effects of sex offender registration on interstate commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).