United States v. Shenandoah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “SORNA does not impose an additional punishment for a predicate sex offense. Instead, SORNA works prospectively creating a new punishment for a new offense, ie., failing to register as a sex offender under SORNA after July 27, 2006.”
• “[A]n overwhelming majority of courts have held that a defendant’s knowledge of his or her obligation to register as a sex offender pursuant to state law demonstrates proof of the probability that he or she had knowledge of his or her duty to register under SORNA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).