96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6094, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9962 United States of America v. Miguel Polanco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the inevitable- 15 discovery doctrine does not apply to an unconstitutional inculpatory statement
• holding the inevitable discovery exception does not apply to the admission of unconstitutional inculpatory statements
• requiring “proof of a ‘connection’ between the use or possession of the firearm and the underlying offense”
• upholding § 922(g)(1) because its “jurisdictional element is a key distinction between § 922(g)(1) and § 922(q)”
• requiring “proof of a ‘connection’ between the use or possession of the firearm and the underlying offense”
• finding that the government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant “pos- sessed” the gun in a manner that facilitated the defendant’s felonious conduct because the presence of the gun in the defendant’s car “potentially emboldened him” to sell drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).