John Doe v. James T. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the right to refuse to register under a sex-offender statute is not a fundamental right
• holding that the right to refuse to register under a sex-offender statute is not a fundamental right
• holding that “[s]tate-created procedural rights that do not guarantee a particular substantive outcome are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, even where such procedural rights are mandatory”
• holding that “[s]tate-created procedural rights that do not guarantee a particular substantive outcome are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, even where such procedural rights are mandatory[]” (cleaned up)
• holding that “[s]tate-created procedural rights that do not guarantee a particular substantive outcome are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, even where such procedural rights are mandatory” (quotation marks omitted)
• holding that the government’s desire to “protect its citizens from criminal activity” was a rational basis for a law re- quiring sex offenders to register their status with a local sheriff’s office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).