Eleventh Circuit· 6/6/2005

John Doe v. James T. Moore

Citations

410 F.3d 1337
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10354
2005 WL 1324592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the right to refuse to register under a sex-offender statute is not a fundamental right
holding that the right to refuse to register under a sex-offender statute is not a fundamental right
holding that “[s]tate-created procedural rights that do not guarantee a particular substantive outcome are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, even where such procedural rights are mandatory”
holding that “[s]tate-created procedural rights that do not guarantee a particular substantive outcome are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, even where such procedural rights are mandatory[]” (cleaned up)
holding that “[s]tate-created procedural rights that do not guarantee a particular substantive outcome are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, even where such procedural rights are mandatory” (quotation marks omitted)
holding that the government’s desire to “protect its citizens from criminal activity” was a rational basis for a law re- quiring sex offenders to register their status with a local sheriff’s office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Kravitch, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.