Skip to main content
· 8/29/2003

United States v. Wesley Bernard Williams

Citations

  • 342 F.3d 350
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18029
  • 2003 WL 22038949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the robbery of a drug dealer satisfied the commerce element
  • finding that “robberies of drug dealers ... impactf ] a trade that plainly is both economic and interstate in character”
  • explaining that “the Government does not have to show an intent to kill or injure”
  • noting that Lopez and Morrison \do not disturb our continued application of this 'minimal effects' standard [to Hobbs Act prosecutions]\
  • recognizing the question of effect on interstate commerce is whether “the relevant class of acts has such an impact,” not whether one particular offense does
  • explaining that “the Government does not have to show an intent to kill or injure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Wilkinson, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.