Skip to main content
· 1/15/1968

Maryland v. Wirtz

Citations

  • 389 U.S. 1031
  • 88 S. Ct. 772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying modern rule and enforcing contract provision vesting jurisdiction and venue exclusively in Gloucester County, Virginia
  • a clause stating “venue of any action” was mandatory and exclusive, not merely a consent to jurisdiction
  • plaintiffs objections that there were no “express mandatory terms such as ‘exclusively1 ” were unavailing where clause demonstrated agreement to venue for all actions in one specific court
  • clause providing that “licensee hereby agrees and consents to the jurisdiction of the courts of the state of Virginia. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be deemed to be in Glouchester County, Virginia” held mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.