Skip to main content
· 2/8/1996

United States v. Troy Powers

Citations

  • 75 F.3d 335
  • 43 Fed. R. Serv. 1103
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1856
  • 1996 WL 49242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The statement need not have been made exclusively, or even primarily, to further the conspiracy.”
  • discussions about directions to pick up drugs or money to pay for drugs were necessary for the actual conspiracy to distribute drugs, and thus were “in furtherance of the conspiracy”
  • \The district court has substantial discretion with respect to the specific wording of instructions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.