Skip to main content

Kemp v. State

Citations

  • 810 S.E.2d 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the evidence was constitutionally sufficient to authorize a conviction for malice murder where, among other things, the defendant and his accomplices attempted to get rid of evidence of the crime
  • reviewing 8 trial court’s implicit factual findings regarding the admissibility of evidence for clear error
  • explaining that, although “the trial court did not make any express factual findings, . . . we can infer from its denial of the motions that it implicitly found that [the] statements were made in the course of and in furtherance of a conspiracy”
  • applying plain error standard of review to the appellant’s unpreserved Confrontation Clause claim
  • affirming trial court’s admission of hearsay statements under OCGA § 24-8-801 (d) (2) (E
  • applying plain error standard of review to the appellant’s unpreserved Confrontation Clause claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.