United States v. Schalk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause [the defendant] affirmatively stated at trial that he had no objection to [the evidence], any potential argu- ment … is waived.”
• statements regarding “supply, demand, transportation, and finances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).