United States v. Jerome Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he foundational requirements necessary for the evidence to be properly received will differ depending on the nature of the proposed evidence.”
• general “foundation” objection did not preserve specific subcategory of a foundation objection, such as inadequate foundation to introduce physical exhibits, hearsay testimony, parol evidence, or expert witness testimony
• general “foundation” objection did not preserve specific subcategory of a foundation objection, such as inadequate foundation to introduce physical exhibits, hearsay 10 No. 23-1667 testimony, parol evidence, or expert witness testimony
• protective sweep justified where officers arrested the defend- ant inside the home and had previously seen a weapon inside the home during an investigation into drug dealing by the de- fendant’s brother
• protective sweep justified where officers arrested the defend- ant inside the home and had previously seen a weapon inside the home during an investigation into drug dealing by the de- fendant’s brother
• protective sweep justified where officers arrested the defend- ant inside the home and had previously seen a weapon inside the home during an investigation into drug dealing by the de- fendant’s brother

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).