Skip to main content
· 8/17/2000

United States v. Jose Solis Jordan

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 676
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20929
  • 2000 WL 1160748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a de novo standard of review applies to review of whether the defendant has made a prima facie case under Batson
  • explaining that a de novo standard of review applies to review of whether the defendant has made a prima facie case under Batson
  • “Appellate review of a district court’s choice of remedy in a voting rights case is for abuse of discretion.”
  • dis- trict court properly instructed the jury that the transcripts of recorded conversations were not evidence and that No. 07-2617 7 only the tape recordings were entitled to weight
  • applying clearly erroneous standard to race challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.