· 8/17/2000
United States v. Jose Solis Jordan
Citations
- 223 F.3d 676
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20929
- 2000 WL 1160748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a de novo standard of review applies to review of whether the defendant has made a prima facie case under Batson
- explaining that a de novo standard of review applies to review of whether the defendant has made a prima facie case under Batson
- “Appellate review of a district court’s choice of remedy in a voting rights case is for abuse of discretion.”
- dis- trict court properly instructed the jury that the transcripts of recorded conversations were not evidence and that No. 07-2617 7 only the tape recordings were entitled to weight
- applying clearly erroneous standard to race challenge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.