United States v. Daniel W. Robinson, Dillard E. Woods, and Paul E. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing limitation of prejudicial impact of 404(b) evidence through jury instruction
• after defendant was read Miranda rights and made two statements, he was told of another’s cooperation with the government; testimony was properly admitted that defendant “dropped his head and said, ‘Oh, forget it’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).