United States v. Noah Ryan Robinson and John Anthony Robinson, and Noah Robinson v. United States of America, and John A. Robinson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, the district court should not consider § 2255 motions while a direct appeal is pending.”
• “[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, the district court should not consider § 2255 motions while a direct appeal is pending.”
• “The amount of fees to be awarded in an interpleader 9 action is committed to the sound discretion of the district court”
• “It seems to me a shocking thing that our police can seize a 9 citizen’s property and then when he seeks to get it back challenge him to prove his title to the 10 satisfaction of a jury.” (citation omitted)
• “The FTCA requires, as a prerequisite for federal court 9 jurisdiction, that a claimant first provide written notification of the incident giving rise to the 10 injury, accompanied by a claim for money damages to the federal agency responsible for the 11 injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).