United States v. Stuart Jeffrey Paskow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a duty to supplement triggered where there is ambiguous 12 evidence or the record is inadequate to allow for proper evaluation of the evidence
• “These two factors must be assessed in connection with the date of the defen dant’s offense, not of his conviction or sentencing.”
• considering the question for ex post facto purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).