United States v. Larry J. Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a “defendant may be both punished for [a] supervised- release violation and prosecuted criminally for the same conduct without implicating principles of double jeopardy”
• stating that creditor must prove each 26 element of a § 523(a) (2) (A) claim by a preponderance
• finding district court’s application of mandatory minimum sentence under Section 3583(g) upon revocation of supervised release violative of Ex Post Facto Clause because defendant committed underlying offense before enactment of statute
• stating that “supervised release is essentially similar to parole”
• noting the frequency of revocation hearings for conduct that is “not a criminal offense”
• noting the frequency of revocation hearings for conduct that is “not a criminal offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).