United States v. Lorenzo Soto-Olivas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[p]roceedings to revoke supervised release . . . need not comply with the procedural protections constitutionally guaranteed for crimi- nal prosecutions”
• “[P]unishment imposed upon revocation of supervised release is punishment for the original crime, not punishment for the conduct leading to revocation”
• punishment imposed upon revocation is punishment for the original crime, not punishment for the conduct leading to revocation
• punishment imposed upon revocation is punishment for the original crime, not punishment for the conduct leading to revocation
• “[D]ouble jeopardy does not preclude criminal prosecution for conduct which also serves as the basis for a parole or probation revocation.” (emphases omitted)
• “[P]unishment imposed upon revocation of supervised release is punishment for the original crime, not punishment for the conduct leading to revocation[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).