Skip to main content
· 2/28/1994

United States v. Filemon Arzate-Nunez

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 730
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1448
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 2542
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3381
  • 1994 WL 56484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a district court is not required to exclude evidence that runs afoul 19 of Rule 26(a) or (e); rather, it may do so if the offending party fails to show that its discovery 20 violation was substantially justified or harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.