United States v. Salvador Ahumada-Avalos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that government did not violate Fourth Amendment by obtaining defendant’s unlisted telephone number from telephone company without warrant
• holding defendant participated in distribution of cocaine because he “arranged for delivery of the drugs, made phone calls negotiating the price, amount, place of delivery, and payment, and traveled in furtherance of the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).