United States v. Michael E. Wyatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court’s choice from two permissible inferences cannot be clearly erroneous
• stating that review of a district court’s sentencing enhance- ment under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) is a mixed question of fact and law that we review for clear error
• rejecting double jeopardy challenge on ground that sanctions for violating the conditions of supervised release are part of the original sentence
• affirming application of enhancement where weapons found in home where defendant distributed and stored drugs, and in close proximity to drug ledgers and drug packaging materials
• rejecting double jeopardy challenge on ground that sanctions for violating the conditions of supervised release are part of the original sentence
• rejecting double jeopardy challenge on ground that sanctions for violating the conditions of supervised release are part of the original sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).