United States v. Sirang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing jury instruction for plain error when counsel objected, the district judge discussed the objection and explained why he substituted his own instruction, and counsel made no further specific objections
• upholding a conviction against a multiplicity challenge because “two transactions may have a common purpose but constitute separate executions of a scheme where each involves a new and independent obligation to be truthful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).