· 5/25/2007
United States v. Ward Franklin Dean
Citations
- 487 F.3d 840
- 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2922
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12191
- 2007 WL 1516144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that it is not plain error when a district court simply follows our pattern jury instructions
- explaining that a district court may enhance a sentence based on its judicial fact findings, so long as it treats the guidelines as advisory and its findings do not increase the sentence beyond the statutory maximum authorized by the offense
- explaining a district court may enhance a sentence based on its judicial fact findings, so long as it recognizes the Guidelines are advisory and its findings do not increase the sentence beyond the statutory maximum authorized by the offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Fay, Cudahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.