Skip to main content
· 5/25/2007

United States v. Ward Franklin Dean

Citations

  • 487 F.3d 840
  • 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2922
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12191
  • 2007 WL 1516144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that it is not plain error when a district court simply follows our pattern jury instructions
  • explaining that a district court may enhance a sentence based on its judicial fact findings, so long as it treats the guidelines as advisory and its findings do not increase the sentence beyond the statutory maximum authorized by the offense
  • explaining a district court may enhance a sentence based on its judicial fact findings, so long as it recognizes the Guidelines are advisory and its findings do not increase the sentence beyond the statutory maximum authorized by the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Fay, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.