United States v. Cora Cadia Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence related to uncharged conduct was inextricably intertwined with charged conduct because it “concerned fraudulent tax returns that were filed by [the defendant], during the same time period, and using the same methods”
• requiring that the district court “make a reasonable estimate of the loss” based on available information
• requiring that the district court “make a reasonable estimate of the loss” based on available information
• finding that evidence of fraudulently filed tax returns, although uncharged, was relevant to show that the defendant did not mistakenly file the fraudulent returns for which she was charged
• stating Rule 404(b) does not apply to evidence that is intrinsic to the charged offenses
• affirming district court’s loss calculation based on an IRS agent’s testimony that he narrowed the total number of tax returns attributable to the defendant using certain addresses linked to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).